IT
Investment - Considering the Full Picture
Most IT organizations look at their budgets as a vital figure.
Emphasis on cutting the budget, limiting the growth of the budget,
coming in under budget and getting the most out of the IT budget
are sensible and natural ways to view IT operations. Direct spending
for IT hardware, software services and staff, however is only
a portion of the investment an organization expends on IT and
focusing too much on this view does not provide a full investment
picture.
ITCentrix views several other components in addition to IT
budget to identify the true IT investment and risk factors that
should be considered in managing IT assets. These include:
- User time spent actively using the applications
- Lost business value from unplanned outages
- The opportunity cost of applications maintenance staff
- Exposure to a disaster (not shown in the pie)

User Time
Consider the following example. An organization has an IT budget
of $20M. It has 2,000 users who, on average, spend approximately
25% of their time actively using the applications supported by
the IT department. The users are paid about $50,000 per year
on a fully loaded basis. Hence, the application's users represent
an investment of $25M per year by the company (2,000 users X
25% X $50,000). Stated another way, the company is spending $25M
per year on funding staff users who do nothing, all day, every
day except actively use the IT applications in question (even
though those full time users are "virtual" (e.g. 25%
of four people's time = 1 FTE).
Downtime Impacts
From an IT perspective, the company has reasonable availability
but suffers moderate outages that last between 30 minutes to
2 hours typically. The users have a slightly different view of
application availability that sometimes differs from that of
the IT folks. Regardless, unplanned application outages definitely
have an impact on productivity, as during an unplanned outage,
the users of the applications, particularly the critical apps,
tend to do other tasks that are less productive than when using
the IT applications in question.
The Cost of "Friction"
Additionally, the company maintains a staff of 10 full time
development professionals that are paid $100,000 per year on
average (fully loaded). A portion of this development staff is
dedicated to doing nothing but maintain the IT applications.
These developers are not adding new function; rather they are
maintaining the existing applications to allow the company to
remain competitive.
Exposure to a Catastrophic Outage
Insurance is a concept we all understand. The impact of a disaster,
however small, represents a risk factor to the business. Most IT
Executives fail to fully evaluate this risk factor when considering
the true investment in IT. The "IT Investment" for this
hypothetical company vastly exceeds its $20M IT budget because:
The investment in user time spent actively accessing applications.
The real cost of downtime (in terms of lost business value) is
meaningful. The maintenance staff is an investment that could be
deployed elsewhere if the company had a "frictionless" development
environment. The exposure to a catastrophic outage, however small,
is a real consideration. When considered in this context, the $20M
IT budget, while a significant portion of a company's IT investment,
does not provide the full picture and represents well under 50%
of the organization's investments in IT. A challenge for executives
is to develop credible and accurate ways to measure opportunities
to maximize business value beyond straight IT budget cuts. ITCentrix
offers a number of software products and services to help clearly
identify these opportunities and identify hidden but significant
value creation opportunities.
|